
Image: The Hindu
A Special Court in Gujarat sentences five men to five years for their roles in the 2016 Una flogging case, highlighting the fight against caste violence in India.
GlipzoIn a significant ruling that reverberates across social justice platforms, a Special Court in Veraval, located in Gujarat’s Gir Somnath district, has sentenced five men to five years’ imprisonment for their involvement in the notorious 2016 Una flogging case. This case, which highlighted the rampant caste-based violence in India, involved a brutal assault on four members of a Dalit family, igniting widespread outrage and protests across the nation.
On March 17, 2026, the court found the accused guilty, issuing not only prison sentences but also a fine of ₹5,000 for each convict. This ruling marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing struggle against caste discrimination in India, reaffirming the commitment of the judiciary to uphold the rights of marginalized communities.
The five individuals sentenced—Ramesh Jadhav, Rakesh Joshi, Nagji Vaniya, Pramodgiri Goswami, and Balwatgiri Goswami—were found culpable in the violent incident that took place nearly a decade ago. The court’s decision came after a lengthy trial process, which has been a focal point for discussions around justice and accountability in cases of caste-based violence.
In this case, the court acquitted 35 other accused individuals, signaling the complexity and challenges in securing convictions in such cases. The proceedings against one police constable, who was named in the case, were closed due to his death, while the trial for a juvenile accused continues, underscoring the ongoing nature of the legal battles faced in this high-profile case.
The Una incident occurred in July 2016 when four members of a Dalit family were publicly assaulted by a mob in Gujarat. The attack was a brutal reminder of the deep-seated caste prejudices that persist in Indian society. Victims were tied to a vehicle and beaten, a shocking act that was recorded and circulated widely, sparking outrage not only in Gujarat but across the entire nation.
This incident ignited widespread protests, with activists and citizens alike demanding justice and highlighting the need for more stringent measures against caste-based violence. The public outcry led to a renewed focus on the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, which aims to protect marginalized communities from discrimination and violence.
The conviction of the five men in the Una flogging case serves as a crucial step towards accountability in cases of caste violence. It sends a strong message that such acts will not be tolerated and that the judicial system stands ready to defend the rights of the oppressed. While the acquittal of many others raises questions about the effectiveness of legal mechanisms, this verdict could encourage other victims of caste-based violence to come forward and seek justice.
As the dust settles on this landmark verdict, several key developments are anticipated. The ongoing trial of the juvenile accused will be closely monitored, as its outcome could further impact public sentiment and legal discourse on caste violence. Additionally, the acquittal of 35 individuals raises concerns about the broader systemic issues within the legal framework that requires examination and reform.
Activists and organizations advocating for Dalit rights are likely to use this moment to press for stronger protections and more rigorous enforcement of existing laws against caste-based violence. The ruling may also lead to a renewed push for educational programs and community outreach initiatives aimed at dismantling caste prejudices.
In summary, while the conviction of the five men is a step forward, it highlights the ongoing struggle against caste-based violence in India. The journey towards justice and equality for marginalized communities continues, with all eyes on the developments that will follow this pivotal case.

Tensions soar as the US and Iran engage in air strikes near the Strait of Hormuz, raising concerns over global oil supply and regional stability.
BBC World
Trump's international interventions face serious stalemates. What will this mean for U.S. foreign policy? Explore the critical challenges ahead.
Indian Express
Tehran denies resignation of President Masoud Pezeshkian amid claims of IRGC influence. What does this mean for Iran's political stability? Click to learn more!
Indian Express