Boney Kapoor and Daughters Fight Legal Battle Over Sridevi's Land

Kapoor Family Takes Legal Action Over Property Dispute

In a significant legal development, Boney Kapoor, along with his daughters Janhvi Kapoor and Khushi Kapoor, has approached the Madras High Court to contest a lower court's decision regarding a civil suit over a piece of land in Chennai. This property, spanning 4.7 acres and located on the East Coast Road (ECR), was purchased by the late actress Sridevi in 1988. The family's challenge comes after a district court in Chengalpattu dismissed their initial petition against claimants seeking a share in the estate.

On March 16, 2026, Justice T.V. Thamilselvi agreed to hear the Kapoor family's joint civil revision petition, with a hearing scheduled for March 26, 2026. Until that date, the court has temporarily halted any further proceedings in the district court concerning the land. The plaintiffs in this case, Chandrabanu and her children, M.C. Sivakami and M.C. Natarajan, assert that they have a legitimate claim to the property.

The Heart of the Dispute: Legitimacy and Property Rights

The Kapoor family contends that the claims made by Chandrabanu and her children are legally flawed. They argue that Chandrabanu was married to M.C. Chandrasekaran, the original owner of the property, during his previous marriage. They maintain that such a marriage is considered void under the law, thus undermining her right to claim any portion of the land.

In their petition, the Kapoor family pointed out: - Chandrabanu's marriage was contracted on February 5, 1975, while her husband was still married to M.C. Banumathi. - This critical detail was allegedly omitted from the genealogy presented by the plaintiffs, suggesting an attempt to mislead the court. - They have been in possession of the property for 38 years, raising questions about the timing of the lawsuit filed in 2025.

The Kapoor family emphasized that there was no dispute regarding ownership during the lifetime of Chandrasekaran, who passed away on May 29, 1995. They also highlighted that both Sivakami and Natarajan reached adulthood in 1995 and 1999, respectively, yet did not raise their claims until now.

Counterarguments from the Plaintiffs

On the other side, the plaintiffs have vehemently rejected the Kapoor family's assertions, arguing that they have every right to question the ownership of the property. They stated: - The Kapoor family has no legal basis to label them as illegitimate children and to question the legitimacy of their familial ties. - They allege that the 1988 sale deeds are illegal and that the Kapoor family obtained a patta (a legal document affirming ownership) in 2023 through fraudulent means. - The plaintiffs claim they only became aware of the property and the alleged misconduct surrounding it in 2023, justifying their decision to file the lawsuit in 2025.

The Chengalpattu district court, on December 1, 2025, dismissed the Kapoor family's plea to reject the plaint, deciding that a full trial was necessary to resolve the matter, which led to their appeal to the Madras High Court.

Why This Legal Battle Matters

This legal confrontation highlights the complexities surrounding property ownership and familial ties, especially in high-profile cases involving celebrities like Sridevi. The outcome may set a precedent for similar disputes in the future, particularly regarding how marriages, legitimacy, and property rights are interpreted under Indian law.

The ongoing litigation raises several important questions: - How will the court interpret the laws surrounding bigamy and property claims? - What implications does this case have for the rights of children in similar situations? - How do public perceptions of celebrity families influence legal proceedings?

What’s Next for the Kapoor Family?

As the Kapoor family prepares for the hearing on March 26, all eyes will be on the Madras High Court. The ruling could significantly impact the family’s ownership of the property and may also have broader implications for property law in India. The Kapoor family's legacy, intertwined with Sridevi's illustrious career, is at stake, and the final decision may resonate well beyond this single case.

In the coming weeks, developments in this case will likely attract considerable media attention, reflecting public interest in the lives of the Kapoor family as well as the intricate details of Indian property law. Stay tuned for updates as this story unfolds, as it promises to reveal much about the interplay between legacy, law, and family dynamics in the world of entertainment.